Search for: "International Fund Management v. CitiGroup Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 8:19 am
Bloomberg Citigroup Saudi Deal Haunts Pandit By Donal Griffin - Nov 30, 2011 Saudi businessman Ghazi Abbar, who claims in an affidavit he lost $383 million of his family’s fortune on investments with Citigroup Inc., was sold one of the transactions even though the bank questioned his ability to properly manage them, according to an internal memo. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
The Delaware chancery court has decided two very important cases arising out of notorious cases of managerial malfeasance or neglect - In re Citigroup Inc Shareholder Derivative Litigation, decided February 24, and American International Group, Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:55 am
Abbar claims he lost $383 million of his family’s fortune when Citigroup sold him products that later soured, even though the bank internally questioned his ability to properly manage some of them. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
In Simien v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:24 am
V. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
Stanford, who told investors that the money was placed in certificates of deposit at the Stanford International Bank based in Antigua, used the money to, among other things, fund his luxurious lifestyle. [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:34 am
According to media, an Ohio pension fund, the Sheet Metal Workers Local 33 Cleveland District Pension Plan, is seeking damages against Goldman Sachs, Citigroup Inc. and ten other banks that, according to the pension fund, have restrained competition for credit default swaps (CDS) in violation of federal antitrust law. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am
Paul Venture Fund, LLC; Minnesota Venture Capital, Inc.; Real Estate of Minnesota, Inc.; and Matrix Venture Capital, Inc.Case number: 10-cv-2166 (United States District Court for the District of Nevada)Case filed: December 14, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 27, 2014 07/24/2014 10/22/2014 2014-73 SEC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Therefore, a board is not required to analyze (or require management to analyze) every risk that confronts a company. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (1878), and not on International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WTO report confirms USTR lost on key issue of whether China’s thresholds for criminal IP enforcement are too high (Managing Intellectual Property) (IP Justice) (IP Justice) (China Hearsay) (China Law Blog) US: Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IP finance) What a concept: sharing new inventions with the world is good for the inventor (Techdirt) Global - Copyright On verifying the Commons (Creative Commons) Australia High Court rules on contributory patent infringement: Northern Territory v V Collins & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) Valuating IP: reputation in trade marks and section 60 evidence? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:04 am
Gordon and Tracy V. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:21 am
A number of prominent large corporations, including Citigroup Inc., Ford Motor Company and Pulte Homes, Inc., have adopted NOL poison pills to protect against perceived threats to their NOL assets. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
No mid-level manager at JPMorgan, for example, made a call to start committing fraud and forgery. [read post]
